Looking for a Leader
John 10:1-18
Gettysburg Presbyterian Church
Rev. Daniel T. Hans
March 2, 2008
What kind of leadership is needed today? The primary election
season leads us to raise that question, as we wonder: Who can best
lead this nation into the future? What kind of leadership
is needed today? The current Congressional investigation
into the lavish living of certain TV evangelists who claim tax
exempt status for their organizations leads us to raise that question,
as we wonder: Are they shepherding the flock or are they fleecing
the flock? What kind of leadership is needed today? A congregation
looking for a new pastor raises that query as it wonders: What
kind of shepherd can best lead this flock into the future?
The recurrent problem of poor leadership arises when leaders care more about the activity of their leading than the objects of that leading. Bad leaders are more interested in their identity as shepherds than in the needs of the sheep. By calling himself “the good shepherd” Jesus fulfills a promise God made through the prophet Ezekiel to provide good leadership. God told the Israelites that He would become their shepherd and would lead them to the freedom and new life his grace offers.
Five centuries later, Jesus appears, having climbed down the ladder of success in his incarnation, and says: I am the good shepherd. Good leadership does not just happen. It must be developed. Good leaders are not born that way. They grow into their role. Jesus entered this world not as a great leader but as a little baby. He became a great leader by committing himself to the people he came to lead.
First, he feeds us with accepting love. When Jesus says, “I have other sheep that are not of this fold, I must bring them also,” he reveals his leadership that seeks to feed everyone everywhere with God’s accepting love. Jesus shows that God’s love is not limited to a nation or race or religion or particular type of person. God’s love is accepting of all and welcomes whoever fill follow the Good Shepherd, whoever is open to God’s love in Christ. Wherever we are in our lives, the Good Shepherd has a place for us in his flock.
Second, Jesus heeds our needs with involved love. We see this action in Jesus’ words: “I know my own and my own know me.” The Hebrew words for shepherd and friend have the same root. One way to understand Jesus as the Good Shepherd is to see him as the Good Friend who is involved in our lives to the point of knowing us personally and loving us as unique individuals.
Interaction and identification between leaders and those being
led lie at the heart of good leadership. In God’s eyes you
are no less important than anyone else in the church but neither
are you more important than anyone else. The same needs to hold
true for those who lead in the name of God
Good shepherd’s then and now must love each person personally
and equally.
Third, Jesus leads with sacrificial love. Three times in our passage Jesus says he lays down his life for his sheep. Such is the sacrificial love he offers to us as a whole flock and to us as individual sheep. Think of what Jesus could have done and been given his identity and power as the Son of God. He could have been a faith healer with his own TV show; he could have been a tenured seminary professor; or he could have been CEO of a huge non-profit charity. This one who could have owned the sheep ranch remains a shepherd and lays down his life for his sheep – not because this is what he wants but because this is what they/we need.
It is a good shepherd, an attractive leader, an appealing friend, who feeds the whole flock with accepting love, who heeds the needs of each individual with involved love, and who leads with sacrificial love that benefits the whole flock and the individual sheep.
The role of love in leadership is a forgotten building block of nations, organizations, and churches. During the American Revolution, George Washington led his troops and the colonies with a deep love for both. The heroic effort it took to get us through that crucial time arose from leaders like Washington who were committed to something much bigger than self. In his biography of Washington entitled His Excellency, Joseph Ellis presents a powerful scene. At the farewell dinner Washington held for his officers, he announced he wanted to greet each man personally before they separated forever. The reception line formed to take his hand.
Henry Knox, one of his most trusted generals, was the first to
come forward. Suddenly, Washington was overcome with emotion.
He ignored Knox’s outstretched hand and instead hugged him,
weeping openly in front of his men. And so it went down the
line. He embraced each man and wept for all of them. If we wonder
what it was that pulled his band of colonies together into a fledgling
nation and held them together, we need look only to this man who
cared enough about this place and its people to be called the father
of our nation. Good leadership cares more about the objects of
its leading than the activity of its leading.
First, good shepherds must be responsible. Leaders in the church are responsible to insure balance between the needs of individuals and the need of the whole group. If the success of the whole group is the singular objective then the seemingly insignificant individual is overlooked. In many highly organized enterprises the “insignificant individuals” who are most often forgotten are the very old and very young. Jesus’ story of the shepherd who leaves the 99 sheep to seek the one lost sheep shows God’s concern for the one and the many. In God’s eyes, the one is as important as the whole group.
The flip side of this responsibility coin involves addressing
an imbalance toward the individual to the detriment of the group.
Here the welfare of the flock is jeopardized by undue attention
to a few sheep the baa the loudest.
Every church has such people. They make congregational life interesting
and pastoral ministry challenging. However, when one person or
a few people get all the attention to the exclusion of the needs
of the whole group, the group’s present health and future
growth are threatened.
A leader does not love the people unless he/she leads them forward
with a vision of what the church can become. The church needs responsible
leaders like Washington who in his love for his nation lead it
toward a goal of freedom. The church needs responsible leaders
like our Lord who in his love for humanity leads us toward the
ultimate goal which is God. Leaders are responsible to love the
individuals and the group as equally as possible and to work toward
a balanced welfare for both M. Scott Peck in his book The Road
Less Traveled writes: The best decision makers are those who
are willing to suffer the most over their decisions but still retain
their ability to be decisive. (p. 76)
Speaking of the inadequacy of impersonal management compared to
personal leadership former NFL coach Bill Parcells has said: You
can manage inventories but you lead people. You can manage
from afar, with a fax machine or a cell phone, but you better be
up close and personal when it comes to leading.
In his book Megatrends 2000 John Naisbitt writes: Any well-trained
person could be a manager. A leader is an individual who builds
follower-ship by ethical conduct and by creating an environment
where the unique potential of one individual can be actualized.
(p. 308)
If the church tries to function only as an organization of efficiency rather
than as a community of the Spirit it will lose sight of
God’s will and God’s ways amid all its own charts and
projections.
No modern leader better incarnates the qualities of the good shepherd
than does Mother Teresa who labored so long and hard in a ministry
of compassion to the poor and dying in India. A couple of
years before she retired from her work due to age and ill health,
she was asked who might succeed her. She said she hoped her
successor would not be selected on the basis of management skills
or on the basis of visionary drive. She hoped they would
pick the least likely person to replace her so that it would be
clear to all that the fruit of one’s ministry and the origin
of all good leadership begin not with human skills but with the
grace of God.
Former seminary professor Fred Craddock tells about an old man
whose only close friend was his dog. Both had begun to feel
the pain and burden of age. The dog, 12-years-old, could
barely walk and was covered with an irritating rash. The
old man lifted the dog in his arms and carried it to the car where
it lay on the seat beside him on the way to the veterinarian. From
the parking lot the old man carried the dog gently inside. “May
I help you?” asked the vet. The old man, still holding
his dog, said, “First, I must ask you a question. Do
you love animals above everything else?” “Well,” replied
the vet, “I love God first as Jesus said to love God with
all your heart and soul and mind; then Jesus said to love your
neighbor as you love yourself. We must put first things first
and then we can think about the animals.”
“Then I must go elsewhere,” said the old man turning to the door.
“Why? What’s wrong?” asked the vet. “This
dog is my friend, so special to me,” said the old man, “and I feel
I can trust him only to the care of a veterinarian who is a Christian.” (Overhearing
the Gospel, p.36)
A congregation seeking a pastor for its beloved church is like that old man seeking a veterinarian for his beloved dog. A Christian vet must put his/her calling to serve animals first. What kind of leadership is needed in the church today? The church needs leaders who do more than mouth the right words. The church needs leaders who in their love for God know that their calling is to love God’s people more than anything else.
Return to the Sermons Menu